Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Archaeology of the recent past on BBC3

Some time-sensitive information. BBC3 has a "series of personal essays about the archaeology of the recent past." They ran/will run on May 26th, 27th, and today, (May 28th) and tomorrow. They'll be available on-line for 7 days after airing.

The first <link> is an interesting discussion by Beth O'Leary at UNM about trying to get the Tranquility Base site (the Apollo 11 landing site, yes, the site on the Moon) listed on the National Register. No go, oddly enough.

The second <link>, which I really liked was Laura McAtackney, a historical archaeologist and Ph.D. student at Bristol, talking about Long Kesh/Maze Prison near Belfast. This is where 10 IRA prisoners died in 1981 during hunger strikes. (Wikepedia:Long Kesh and the 1981 hunger Strikes).












The hunger strikers:From left to right, clockwise: Bobby Sands, Francis Hughes, Ray McCreesh, Patsy O'Hara, Joe McDonnell, Martin Hurson, Kevin Lynch, Kieran Doherty, Thomas McElwee, Michael Devine.














Long Kesh/Maze Prison

(images from www.irishfreedomcommittee.net)

She talks about the prison as a site of memory, and how its importance can't be disentangled from its political meaning.

What do you do with a site like that? The usual apparently; "a 5,000-seat indoor arena; a rural excellence and equestrian zone featuring an international exhibition centre and showgrounds; an hotel; offices; cafés and restaurants and a multi-screen cinema alongside an industrial zone with the potential for up to 6,000 jobs; housing and parkland." (First peek at Maze masterplan, BBC News Jan 30 2007).

The third and fourth talks aren't up yet, but are on (a) culturally-marked trees in Britain (so probably not involving Basque Shepherd porn) and (b) a Long wave radio station.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Archaeology and catastrophe

I saw this on Boingboing this morning. Photographer Philip Toledano has been photographing the offices of bankrupt companies (Link).


"When I started shooting bankrupt offices I found it to be more archaeology than photography. Everywhere I went I found signs of life interrupted."


We seem to be living in times of abandonment.

On a related and actually better note, once again at Middle Savagery--The Great Abandonment

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Slow Saturday

Posted by Picasa

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Theory and CRM (part 2): Smell Bacon?

It isn't possible to operate without theoretical commitments, not really. So there is a dominant theory in CRM, we just don't admit it. If I had to describe this theory, it is a mix of Baconian inductivism and, well, animism. I'll tackle animism later, so first: Baconian inductivism. Lots of syllables, simple idea. Insofar as we have a disciplinary commitment, beyond regulatory hoop-jumping, it can be summed up as total description ("grokking the site in its fullness" to quote the late Ned Heite) and adding to the dataset of sites. We don't need theory because we are simply describing, using standard methods--thought is unnecessary when action is guided solely by procedure.

The people who will need theory are the proverbial "future archaeologists," the obsessed unfortunates who will read all our reports, see the patterns in the data, synthesize them, and, long after we are dead, finally give our professional careers meaning. There will be jet packs in the future too.

Thus ethical concerns in CRM often find shape, not in the hope for social justice or a better society, but in the nervously detailed recording of assorted variables that are chosen, not for their contribution to research, but because "future archaeologists might want to know." Our professional careers can be Kafkaesque exercises where we are forever accumulating evidence to defend ourselves before a tribunal that doesn't yet exist, whose charges we don't know, and whose needs we can't understand. No wonder we drink so much.


Josef K, Lena, and the "dataset" (The Trial 1962)

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Theory and CRM (Part 1): We don't need no steenking theory.

[This is the first of probably many (somewhat frustrated) posts on CRM and its relation to archaeological thought. They are an effort to capture dominant attitudes--a broad-brush "archaeologist-on- the-street" picture. As such, I am trying to make a coherent text out of attitudes that are unconscious and usually not coherent, and will almost certainly be refining my thoughts as I go.]

The bulk of archaeologists in CRM usually have little use for theory. We are, after all, too busy in the trenches, doing archaeology in the real world, to have time for abstract academic issues like theory. We regard theory at best as a luxury, at worst with outright mistrust. We can do archaeology without theory.

This is a delusional belief, yet I would say it is the dominant attitude in CRM, and CRM suffers for it. Theory is simply being open about one's assumptions--ideology made explicit. One is always operating theoretically (or, failing that, ideologically).

But how do we maintain the illusion of atheoreticism?

By its nature CRM is procedural. If, as I do, one sees CRM's ultimate purpose as establishing some sort of landscape of social memory, then one is resigned to the idea that CRM is irredeemably messy, noisy, and argumentative (or would be if anyone really cared). However we operate in in a regulatory setting, overseen by bureaucrats who are responsible to a variety of insititutional funding bodies (from agencies to developers), and our business depends on making sure clients' projects pass through regulatory digestive tract as smoothly as possible. In a situation like that, nobody wants messy, noisy, and argumentative. What is good is predictability and regularity, and final products of a certain consistency that land where they should, never to be seen again. I'm about to loose control of this metaphor, but my point is that CRM's emphasis on procedure and predictability is a major factor that make the illusion of atheoreticism possible.

A second and related factor is social isolation: routinized research conducted in a good old boy (or girl) echo-chamber is hardly conducive to introspection. With very few exceptions, the results of CRM projects are relevant only to other CRM projects--our reports disappear into the grey-literature morass, possibility to achieve some sort of use as citations in other grey-literature reports. The social "push" to argue a site's meaning or importance beyond the rote research questions of one's immediate circle of CRM cronies just isn't there. I don't know how many projects ever see any sort of publication or public dissemination--but not many. We sneer at isolated ivory-tower of academia, but I am not sure an isolated mushroom-encrusted basement is any better.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Mountain Misery

This is a shot of my foot, while I was collapsed exhausted during a survey in the Sierra foothills.
  • There is lead and arsenic in the soil in some areas (the residue of hard-rock gold-mining) so we are wearing coveralls. We strip them off at the end of the day and don't take the dust back to civilization with us. Ditto for the poison oak oil.
  • Note the duct tape "puttees." I'd always wondered if puttees served a practical purpose. They do. They keep ants out of your trouser legs and off the doodads. We figured this out the first day.
  • The green stuff all over my boot is pine pollen. We are covered in the stuff.
  • The plant is apparently called "Mountain Misery." I don't know what it's real name is. I was told it got this name from continually getting tangled in wagon wheels--that has a real 1930s "pioneerin' lore" feel to me, but ok. The stuff is pretty tiresome. It smells like artichoke, and has tripped me badly twice.

No meth labs yet. That's good.
Posted by Picasa

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Archaeology and Migrants
















Migrant pea pickers camp in the rain. California.
(Dorothea Lange 1936, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division)


Colleen Morgan, on her blog Middle Savagery, had an interesting post about material abandoned by illegal immigrants along the US-Mexico border ("Borderlands Archaeology"). It was sparked by a Fox News story on the (*ahem*) "millions" of dollars the cleanup is costing. The story closes with a quote by the head of the Minute Men "Truly, it's a national disaster of our cherished outdoor areas."

Hmm...

Lying assholes.

Where was I? Oh, right, archaeology. Colleen Morgan makes the point that these deposits could be studied archaeologically to see what people left behind when push came to shove. The Fox article quotes a BLM staffer "Blankets, airline tickets, Bibles, wedding pictures, photos of children, school reports, because clearly people don't tend to throw away everything they've brought with them — they're forced to." It's rather sad--alot of small tragedies.

Some archaeologists have been trying to work on archaeological approaches to migrant and transient labor, which has a long history in the West. It's not easy. Few personal possessions, very little appearance in the documentary record (migrant labor is often undocumented labor), and hidden, out-of-the-way, sites. "Giving voice to the people without history" (or some other such phrasing) is often a standard justification for historical archaeology, but seems to be true as long as those people had enough "stuff" to study. Looking at transient assemblages from the point of view of what is NOT there may be a good way to go. The modern borderlands assemblages may give some indication of what people had, and wanted to bring, but ultimately could not.

Conversely small personal items found on migrant labor sites beyond the border would acquire that much more weight since they were retained under difficult or even desperate circumstances. For example David Parkin (1999) discussed the objects refugees take with them. There are the practical objects; then there are the ones that in some sense signify and carry memories of social relations ("mementoes") that might serve to reconstitute a somewhat familiar sense of identity in a foreign place.

As an archaeologist, I've always loved the passage from The Grapes of Wrath when the Joads are choosing what goes to California and what is burnt. It is too big to ever quote in a paper or article, so I'll do it here.

When everything that could be sold was sold, stoves and bedsteads, chairs and tables, little corner cupboards, tubs and tanks, still there were piles of possessions; and the women sat among them, turning them over and looking of beyond and back, pictures, square glasses, and here's a vase.

Now you know well what we can take and what we can't take. We'll be camping out--a few pots to cook and wash in, and mattresses and comforts, lantern and buckets, and a piece of canvas. Use that for a tent. This kerosene can. Know what that is? That's the stove. And clothes--take all the clothes. And--the rifle? Wouldn't go out naked of a rifle. When the shoes and clothes and food, when even hope is gone, we'll have the rifle. Nothing else. That goes. And a bottle for water. That just about fills us. Right up the sides of the trailer, and the kids can set in the trailer, and granma on a mattress. Tools, a shovel and saw and wrench and pliers. An ax, too. We had that ax forty years. Look how she's wore down. And ropes, of course. Leave it--or burn it up.

And the children came.

If Mary takes that doll, that dirty rag doll, I got to take my Injun bow. I got to. An ' this roun' stick--big as me. I might need this stick. I had this stick so long--a month, or maybe a year. I got to take it. And what's it like in California?

The women sat among the doomed things, turning them over and looking past them and back. This book. My father had it. He liked a book. Pilgrim's Progress. Used to read it. Got his name in it. and his pipe--still smells rank. And this picture--an angel. I looked at that before the fust three come--didn't seem to do much good. Think we could get this china dog in? Aunt Sadie brought it from the St. Louis Fair. See? Wrote right on it. No, I guess not. Here's a letter my brother wrote the day before he died. Here's an old-time hat. These feathers--never got to use them. No, there isn't room.

How can we live without our lives? How will we know it's us without our past? No. Leave it. Burn it.
(Steinbeck 1939:88)


Parkin, David J.
1999 “Mementoes as Transitional Objects in Human Displacement.” Journal of Material Culture 4.3: 303-320.

Steinbeck, John
1939 The Grapes of Wrath. New York, NY: Penguin Books, (rep. 2002) .

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Who am I? What is this?

I'm a historical archaeologist living and working in the U.S. West. I earn a living doing contract archaeology (CRM--"Cultural Resource Management") and trying to write a dissertation in my copious free time.

I really intend this blog to be a kind of "stretching exercise" before doing the writing I should be doing--writing what I want so I can then move on to writing what I should. I have no clear agenda for the blog, but the various moles I intend to whack will generally pop up of the theory and practice of archaeology, particularly within CRM.